Marks v. Goldhorn Realty Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Marks v. Goldhorn Realty Corp.

196 Misc. 303, 92 N.Y.S.2d 92, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2765

New York Supreme Court·Decided March 1, 1949·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Benvenga, J.

Motion for a temporary injunction is granted to the extent that the defendant will be required to furnish eight-hour doorman service which it concedes was furnished in the past. It is denied as premature insofar as it seeks to require the defendant to supply elevator operator service without prejudice to renewal if it appears that the defendant actually does discontinue such service. The motion is otherwise denied (Goldberg v. Grant, N. Y. L. J., Nov. 4, 1948, p. 1032, col. 6, mod. 274 App. Div. 993). The cause will be preferred and set at the head of the Ready Calendar of Special Term, Part III, for the 4th of April, 1949. Settle order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Benvenga, J.

Motion for a temporary injunction is granted to the extent that the defendant will be required to furnish eight-hour doorman service which it concedes was furnished in the past. It is denied as premature insofar as it seeks to require the defendant to supply elevator operator service without prejudice to renewal if it appears that the defendant actually does discontinue such service. The motion is otherwise denied (Goldberg v. Grant, N. Y. L. J., Nov. 4, 1948, p. 1032, col. 6, mod. 274 App. Div. 993). The cause will be preferred and set at the head of the Ready Calendar of Special Term, Part III, for the 4th of April, 1949. Settle order.

Marks v. Goldhorn Realty Corp., 196 Misc. 303, 92 N.Y.S.2d 92, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2765 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1949).

Pincite

196 Misc. 303 (Marks v. Goldhorn Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related