Marks v. Goldhorn Realty Corp.

196 Misc. 303, 92 N.Y.S.2d 92, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2765
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 1, 1949
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 196 Misc. 303 (Marks v. Goldhorn Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marks v. Goldhorn Realty Corp., 196 Misc. 303, 92 N.Y.S.2d 92, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2765 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1949).

Opinion

Benvenga, J.

Motion for a temporary injunction is granted to the extent that the defendant will be required to furnish eight-hour doorman service which it concedes was furnished in the past. It is denied as premature insofar as it seeks to require the defendant to supply elevator operator service without prejudice to renewal if it appears that the defendant actually does discontinue such service. The motion is otherwise denied (Goldberg v. Grant, N. Y. L. J., Nov. 4, 1948, p. 1032, col. 6, mod. 274 App. Div. 993). The cause will be preferred and set at the head of the Ready Calendar of Special Term, Part III, for the 4th of April, 1949. Settle order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Raphael v. Viojon Realty Corp.
195 Misc. 229 (New York Supreme Court, 1949)
Phillips v. Hilmont Realty Corp.
195 Misc. 270 (New York Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 Misc. 303, 92 N.Y.S.2d 92, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marks-v-goldhorn-realty-corp-nysupct-1949.