Marks v. Gallagher

184 Misc. 358, 53 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1508
New York Supreme Court·Decided February 1, 1945·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Memorandum Per Curiam.

The issue of the landlord’s good faith in seeking to obtain the possession of the tenant’s apartment for nse by himself as a dwelling was properly resolved by the jury in favor of the tenant. Having failed on this issue the landlord was not entitled to a final order in view of the provisions of paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of section 6 of the standard Rent Regulation for Housing issued by the Office of Price Administration (8 Fed. Reg. 13918). It was, therefore, error for the trial court to set the verdict aside and to direct a verdict in favor of the landlord.

The final order should he reversed, with $30 costs, verdict reinstated and final order directed in favor of the tenant, with costs. The appeal from the judgment should he dismissed.

Hammer, Shientag and Heoht, JJ.s concur.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marks v. Gallagher, 184 Misc. 358, 53 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1508 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1945).

184 Misc. 358 (Marks v. Gallagher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blitzkrieg Amusement Corp. v. Rubenstein Bros.
184 Misc. 975 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1945)