Markowski v. Steins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Markowski v. Steins

207 A.D.2d 669, 616 N.Y.S.2d 939, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8640

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 1, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 207 A.D.2d 669 (Markowski v. Steins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Markowski v. Steins, 207 A.D.2d 669, 616 N.Y.S.2d 939, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8640 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Arber, J.), entered on or about October 12, 1993, which denied petitioner stock broker’s application pursuant to CPLR 7503 to stay arbitration demanded by respondent customer, and dismissed the proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner’s contention that respondent’s RICO claims are not arbitrable is contrary to precedent (Shearson/Am. Express [670]*670v McMahon, 482 US 220, 238-242; Matter of Helmsley Enters. [Lepercq, Deneuflize & Co.], 168 AD2d 224, 226). Further, petitioner waived his right to seek a stay by participating in the arbitration. (Matter of National Cash Register Co. [Wilson], 8 NY2d 377.) Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Ellerin and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Arber, J.), entered on or about October 12, 1993, which denied petitioner stock broker’s application pursuant to CPLR 7503 to stay arbitration demanded by respondent customer, and dismissed the proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner’s contention that respondent’s RICO claims are not arbitrable is contrary to precedent (Shearson/Am. Express [670]*670v McMahon, 482 US 220, 238-242; Matter of Helmsley Enters. [Lepercq, Deneuflize & Co.], 168 AD2d 224, 226). Further, petitioner waived his right to seek a stay by participating in the arbitration. (Matter of National Cash Register Co. [Wilson], 8 NY2d 377.) Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Ellerin and Asch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 A.D.2d 669, 616 N.Y.S.2d 939, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/markowski-v-steins-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack