Markowski v. North Broward Hospital District

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Markowski v. North Broward Hospital District

894 So. 2d 1077, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2538, 2005 WL 475504

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 2, 2005

DocketNo. 4D04-105

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 894 So. 2d 1077 (Markowski v. North Broward Hospital District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Markowski v. North Broward Hospital District, 894 So. 2d 1077, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2538, 2005 WL 475504 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Markowski challenges the granting of summary judgment in favor of the North Broward Hospital District. We affirm, in part, on all grounds, save one, without comment. We reverse, in part, and remand for the trial court to reduce the award of taxable costs by $180.00. Appellee concedes the depositions so taxed were not submitted to the trial court in support of the motion for summary judgment, thus should not have been taxed as costs. See generally Reeser v. Boats Unlimited, Inc., 432 So.2d 1346, 1349 n. 2 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (quoting the Statewide Uniform Guidelines for Taxation of Costs which allows for the taxation of costs for depositions “used to successfully support a Motion for Summary Judgment.”).

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART.

GUNTHER, STONE and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Markowski challenges the granting of summary judgment in favor of the North Broward Hospital District. We affirm, in part, on all grounds, save one, without comment. We reverse, in part, and remand for the trial court to reduce the award of taxable costs by $180.00. Appellee concedes the depositions so taxed were not submitted to the trial court in support of the motion for summary judgment, thus should not have been taxed as costs. See generally Reeser v. Boats Unlimited, Inc., 432 So.2d 1346, 1349 n. 2 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (quoting the Statewide Uniform Guidelines for Taxation of Costs which allows for the taxation of costs for depositions “used to successfully support a Motion for Summary Judgment.”).

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART.

GUNTHER, STONE and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

894 So. 2d 1077, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2538, 2005 WL 475504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/markowski-v-north-broward-hospital-district-fladistctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack