Markowitz v. Nagle Avenue Construction Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Markowitz v. Nagle Avenue Construction Co.

206 A.D. 743

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1923·Published

Opinion

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that the fact that the plaintiff answered ready, when he was not, is practically conceded. In addition, plaintiff does not now set forth any facts from which the court could see that he has a meritorious cause of action. (Rothschild v. Haviland, 172 App. Div. 562.) Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Finch, McAvoy and Martin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that the fact that the plaintiff answered ready, when he was not, is practically conceded. In addition, plaintiff does not now set forth any facts from which the court could see that he has a meritorious cause of action. (Rothschild v. Haviland, 172 App. Div. 562.) Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Finch, McAvoy and Martin, JJ.

Markowitz v. Nagle Avenue Construction Co., 206 A.D. 743 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

206 A.D. 743 (Markowitz v. Nagle Avenue Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related