Markowitz v. Nagle Avenue Construction Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Markowitz v. Nagle Avenue Construction Co.

206 A.D. 743

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1923

StatusPublished

This text of 206 A.D. 743 (Markowitz v. Nagle Avenue Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Markowitz v. Nagle Avenue Construction Co., 206 A.D. 743 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that the fact that the plaintiff answered ready, when he was not, is practically conceded. In addition, plaintiff does not now set forth any facts from which the court could see that he has a meritorious cause of action. (Rothschild v. Haviland, 172 App. Div. 562.) Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Finch, McAvoy and Martin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that the fact that the plaintiff answered ready, when he was not, is practically conceded. In addition, plaintiff does not now set forth any facts from which the court could see that he has a meritorious cause of action. (Rothschild v. Haviland, 172 App. Div. 562.) Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Finch, McAvoy and Martin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

206 A.D. 743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/markowitz-v-nagle-avenue-construction-co-nyappdiv-1923.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack