Markowitz v. Markowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Markowitz v. Markowitz

254 A.D. 586, 3 N.Y.S.2d 57, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6663

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 25, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 254 A.D. 586 (Markowitz v. Markowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Markowitz v. Markowitz, 254 A.D. 586, 3 N.Y.S.2d 57, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6663 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for separation on the grounds of abandonment and failure to provide for plaintiff and her child, judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. The proof was sufficient to warrant a judgment of separation. Find-? ings of fact “ fourth ” and “ fifth ” are reversed. We grant a new trial in order that, if plaintiff succeed thereon, the questions of alimony and the custody of the child ipay be considered. Appeal from certain findings of fact and conclusions of law dismissed. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for separation on the grounds of abandonment and failure to provide for plaintiff and her child, judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. The proof was sufficient to warrant a judgment of separation. Find-? ings of fact “ fourth ” and “ fifth ” are reversed. We grant a new trial in order that, if plaintiff succeed thereon, the questions of alimony and the custody of the child ipay be considered. Appeal from certain findings of fact and conclusions of law dismissed. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D. 586, 3 N.Y.S.2d 57, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/markowitz-v-markowitz-nyappdiv-1938.