Markowitz v. Gourdine

105 A.D.2d 697, 481 N.Y.S.2d 318, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20804

This text of 105 A.D.2d 697 (Markowitz v. Gourdine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Markowitz v. Gourdine, 105 A.D.2d 697, 481 N.Y.S.2d 318, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20804 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

In a proceeding to quash subpoenas duces tecum, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Aronin, J.), dated June 17,1983, which, inter alia, granted the application.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Appellants have failed to demonstrate that many of the records demanded in the nonjudicial subpoenas herein bear a reasonable relationship to the subject matter of the investigation (see Myerson v Lentini Bros. Mov. & Stor. Co., 33 NY2d 250). The subpoenas are overbroad. Gibbons, J. P., O’Connor, Weinstein and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Myerson v. Lentini Brothers Moving & Storage Co.
306 N.E.2d 804 (New York Court of Appeals, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 A.D.2d 697, 481 N.Y.S.2d 318, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/markowitz-v-gourdine-nyappdiv-1984.