Markofsky v. Markofsky

384 So. 2d 38, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16859
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 13, 1980·No. Nos. 79-2293, 79-2396·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order under review is affirmed upon a holding that: (a) the wife Gertrude Markofsky, although a Canadian citizen, established on this record the requisite six months residency requirement in Florida to bring this marriage dissolution action, Pawley v. Pawley, 46 So.2d 464, 471 (Fla.1950); Perez v. Perez, 164 So.2d 561 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964); § 61.021, Fla.Stat. (1979); and (b) the trial court was not required, either as a matter of jurisdiction or comity, to dismiss the instant marriage dissolution action in deference to prior Canadian divorce proceedings involving the parties as the parties and the parties’ minor children are, and have been for a considerable time, residents of Florida. Schrey v. Schrey, 354 So.2d 405 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Markofsky v. Markofsky, 384 So. 2d 38, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16859 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

384 So. 2d 38 (Markofsky v. Markofsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Timo Scheider v. Jessica Laura Hinterseer-Scheider
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2026
Maraj v. Maraj
642 So. 2d 1103 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Siegel v. Siegel
548 So. 2d 266 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Nicolas v. Nicolas
444 So. 2d 1118 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)