Marko v. Quackenbush

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Marko v. Quackenbush

491 A.2d 713, 99 N.J. 220, 1984 N.J. LEXIS 3568

DecidedDecember 20, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 491 A.2d 713 (Marko v. Quackenbush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marko v. Quackenbush, 491 A.2d 713, 99 N.J. 220, 1984 N.J. LEXIS 3568 (N.J. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Leave to appeal is granted and the order of the Superior Court, Law Division, is summarily reversed; the matter is remanded to the Law Division for the imposition on defendant Honeywell of sanctions in the form of reasonable counsel fees and costs incurred by plaintiffs in respect of the applications made the trial court, the Appellate Division and to this Court [221]*221arising out of the failure of Honeywell to answer interrogatories in a timely fashion.

Jurisdiction is not retained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leave to appeal is granted and the order of the Superior Court, Law Division, is summarily reversed; the matter is remanded to the Law Division for the imposition on defendant Honeywell of sanctions in the form of reasonable counsel fees and costs incurred by plaintiffs in respect of the applications made the trial court, the Appellate Division and to this Court [221]*221arising out of the failure of Honeywell to answer interrogatories in a timely fashion.

Jurisdiction is not retained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

491 A.2d 713, 99 N.J. 220, 1984 N.J. LEXIS 3568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marko-v-quackenbush-nj-1984.