Marko & Magolnick, P.A. v. Berens

165 So. 3d 24, 2015 WL 1811908
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 22, 2015
DocketNo. 3D15-597
StatusPublished

This text of 165 So. 3d 24 (Marko & Magolnick, P.A. v. Berens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marko & Magolnick, P.A. v. Berens, 165 So. 3d 24, 2015 WL 1811908 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Marko & Magolnick, P.A. and the other Petitioners seek review of the trial court’s Amended Order Vacating Order Sealing Court File dated March 12, 2015. Following a thorough review of the petition, the response and reply as well as the statutes and case law in question, we conclude that the trial court did not err in entering the Order. Likewise, the trial court did not depart from the essential requirements of the law and there is no showing of irreparable harm. Bentrust Fin., Inc. v. Ocean Auto Ctr., Inc., 116 So.3d 568 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013). As a result, Petitioners’ Emergency Petition for Review of Trial Court Order and Alternative Petition for Writ of Certiorari is hereby denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bentrust Financial, Inc. v. Ocean Auto Center, Inc.
116 So. 3d 568 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
165 So. 3d 24, 2015 WL 1811908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marko-magolnick-pa-v-berens-fladistctapp-2015.