Markman v. Zitner

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Markman v. Zitner

438 So. 2d 1011, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22458

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 12, 1983

DocketNo. 82-1891

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 438 So. 2d 1011 (Markman v. Zitner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Markman v. Zitner, 438 So. 2d 1011, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22458 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We believe the trial court erroneously concluded on summary judgment that the appellant’s claim for breach of a written employment contract was completely barred by the settlement agreement made by the appellant on his worker’s compensation claim. Cf. Grice v. Suwanee Manufacturing Co., 113 So.2d 742 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959). Accordingly, this cause is reversed and remanded for further proceedings in accord herewith.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and BERANEK and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We believe the trial court erroneously concluded on summary judgment that the appellant’s claim for breach of a written employment contract was completely barred by the settlement agreement made by the appellant on his worker’s compensation claim. Cf. Grice v. Suwanee Manufacturing Co., 113 So.2d 742 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959). Accordingly, this cause is reversed and remanded for further proceedings in accord herewith.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and BERANEK and DELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

438 So. 2d 1011, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/markman-v-zitner-fladistctapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack