Markley v. Kessering
2 Pennyp. 187
Opinion
There is nothing in any of the assignments of error. The fact that the contract of marriage was entered into on Sunday could not avail in view especially of the evidence of subsequent reqognition. The case was properly submitted to the jury.
Jugment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Markley v. Kessering, 2 Pennyp. 187 (Pa. 1882).
2 Pennyp. 187 (Markley v. Kessering) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Szajnecki v. Szajnecki
71 Pa. Super. 487 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1919)