Markley v. I. E. Schilling Co.

91 Fla. 1031
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 5, 1926·Published

Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing.

Per Curiam.

— The action against the defendants below was not as stockholders of a corporation who under the statute were liable as partners because a requirement of the law was not complied with, and the defendants did not by plea aver their status as being that of stockholders. There was consequently no occasion for the court to discuss whether there was a dissolution of a corporation. The evidence referred to the corporation and that was adverted to only so far as it showed the existence, continuance and termination of a relation in the nature of a partnership among the defendants who were sued as copartners and not as stockholders with a statutory partnership liability.

Rehearing denied.

Whitpield, P. J., and Terrell and Bupord, J. J. concur. Brown, C. J., and Ellis, J., concur in the opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Markley v. I. E. Schilling Co., 91 Fla. 1031 (Fla. 1926).

91 Fla. 1031 (Markley v. I. E. Schilling Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.