Markley v. Godfrey
98 A. 785, 254 Pa. 99, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 691
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 15, 1916
DocketAppeal, No. 85
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases
This text of 98 A. 785 (Markley v. Godfrey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Markley v. Godfrey, 98 A. 785, 254 Pa. 99, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 691 (Pa. 1916).
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the learned president judge of the court below discharging the rule for judgment non obstante veredicto.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
EDU, LLC v. Rota, P.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2018
City of Buffalo v. Strong & Co.
106 N.E.2d 217 (New York Court of Appeals, 1952)
Matevish v. Ramey Borough School District
74 A.2d 797 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1950)
Warner Bros. Theatres, Inc. v. Proffitt
198 A. 56 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
Bonner v. Randal
7 Pa. D. & C. 294 (Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, 1925)
Riddle Co. v. Taubel
120 A. 776 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1923)
Hannan v. Carroll
120 A. 665 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1923)
Riddle Co. v. Taubel
2 Pa. D. & C. 247 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1922)
Hirst v. Freeman
1 Pa. D. & C. 675 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1922)
Vilsack v. Wilson
112 A. 17 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1920)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
98 A. 785, 254 Pa. 99, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/markley-v-godfrey-pa-1916.