Markle Interests, L. L.C. v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv.

Fifth Circuit

Markle Interests, L. L.C. v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv.

919 F.3d 963

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 2, 2019

DocketNo. 14-31008; Cons/w 14-31021

StatusPublished

This text of 919 F.3d 963 (Markle Interests, L. L.C. v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Markle Interests, L. L.C. v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv., 919 F.3d 963 (5th Cir. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

*964On June 30, 2016, in a divided opinion, we affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment to appellee United States Fish and Wildlife Service in this lawsuit challenging the Service's designation of land in St. Tammany Parish as "critical habitat" for the dusky gopher frog under the Endangered Species Act. Markle Interests, L.L.C. v. United States Fish & Wildlife Serv. , 827 F.3d 452 (5th Cir. 2016). The Supreme Court granted certiorari and vacated our judgment on November 27, 2018. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv. , --- U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 361, 202 L.Ed.2d 269 (2018). In light of the Supreme Court's order, we REMAND to the district court for further proceedings, including any determination as to the appropriateness of a remand to Fish and Wildlife Service.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

*964On June 30, 2016, in a divided opinion, we affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment to appellee United States Fish and Wildlife Service in this lawsuit challenging the Service's designation of land in St. Tammany Parish as "critical habitat" for the dusky gopher frog under the Endangered Species Act. Markle Interests, L.L.C. v. United States Fish & Wildlife Serv. , 827 F.3d 452 (5th Cir. 2016). The Supreme Court granted certiorari and vacated our judgment on November 27, 2018. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv. , --- U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 361, 202 L.Ed.2d 269 (2018). In light of the Supreme Court's order, we REMAND to the district court for further proceedings, including any determination as to the appropriateness of a remand to Fish and Wildlife Service.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

919 F.3d 963, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/markle-interests-l-lc-v-us-fish-wildlife-serv-ca5-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack