Markland v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Markland v. State

742 So. 2d 325, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9705, 1999 WL 510745

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 21, 1999

DocketNo. 99-1639

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 742 So. 2d 325 (Markland v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Markland v. State, 742 So. 2d 325, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9705, 1999 WL 510745 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s claims under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 are time-barred. See id. R. 3.850(b). None of appellant’s claims qualify under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). As to the double jeopardy claims, see Novaton v. State 634 So.2d 607 (Fla.1994). As to the claims based on State v. Gray, 654 So.2d 552 (Fla.1995), see State v. Woodley, 695 So.2d 297, 298 (Fla.1997) (stating that the decision in Gray is not retroactive).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s claims under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 are time-barred. See id. R. 3.850(b). None of appellant’s claims qualify under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). As to the double jeopardy claims, see Novaton v. State 634 So.2d 607 (Fla.1994). As to the claims based on State v. Gray, 654 So.2d 552 (Fla.1995), see State v. Woodley, 695 So.2d 297, 298 (Fla.1997) (stating that the decision in Gray is not retroactive).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

742 So. 2d 325, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9705, 1999 WL 510745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/markland-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack