Markland v. Markland

392 N.E.2d 886, 47 N.Y.2d 856, 418 N.Y.S.2d 773, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2130
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 7, 1979·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal denied as unnecessary. An appeal taken as of right under CPLR 5601 (subd [a], par [iii]) brings up for review all aspects of the order appealed from (Dalrymple v Shults Chevrolet, 39 NY2d 795). Motion to submit photocopies of plaintiffs exhibits 1 through 5 in lieu of the missing originals granted, except that page 1 of exhibit 3 be stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Markland v. Markland, 392 N.E.2d 886, 47 N.Y.2d 856, 418 N.Y.S.2d 773, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2130 (N.Y. 1979).

392 N.E.2d 886 (Markland v. Markland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Overseas Raleigh Manufacturing, Ltd.
406 N.E.2d 806 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)