Markland v. Markland

Supreme Court of Florida

Markland v. Markland

13 So. 2d 817, 153 Fla. 129, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 564

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Markland v. Markland. Read the opinion of the Court — 155 Fla. 629 →

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 8, 1943·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We have found no error in the orders of the chancellor denying the motions to dismiss the bill, to strike parts of it and to compel its amendment; nor have we found that the chancellor erred in providing, in the order dissolving the injunction issued at the instance of the appellee, that the “bonds are cancelled and discharged” it being our view that any liability incurred on the bonds prior to the date of the signing of the order 20 November 1942 was unaffected.

The application of appellee for “suit money consisting of counsel fees” is denied.

*130 Affirmed.

BUFORD, C. J., BROWN, THOMAS and SEBRING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

We have found no error in the orders of the chancellor denying the motions to dismiss the bill, to strike parts of it and to compel its amendment; nor have we found that the chancellor erred in providing, in the order dissolving the injunction issued at the instance of the appellee, that the “bonds are cancelled and discharged” it being our view that any liability incurred on the bonds prior to the date of the signing of the order 20 November 1942 was unaffected.

The application of appellee for “suit money consisting of counsel fees” is denied.

*130 Affirmed.

BUFORD, C. J., BROWN, THOMAS and SEBRING, JJ., concur.

Markland v. Markland, 13 So. 2d 817, 153 Fla. 129, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 564 (Fla. 1943).

Pincite

13 So. 2d 817 (Markland v. Markland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.