Markland v. Markland
This text of 13 So. 2d 817 (Markland v. Markland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have found no error in the orders of the chancellor denying the motions to dismiss the bill, to strike parts of it and to compel its amendment; nor have we found that the chancellor erred in providing, in the order dissolving the injunction issued at the instance of the appellee, that the “bonds are cancelled and discharged” it being our view that any liability incurred on the bonds prior to the date of the signing of the order 20 November 1942 was unaffected.
The application of appellee for “suit money consisting of counsel fees” is denied.
*130 Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 So. 2d 817, 153 Fla. 129, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/markland-v-markland-fla-1943.