Markivee v. Markivee

Missouri Court of Appeals

Markivee v. Markivee

358 S.W.3d 176, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1698, 2011 WL 6629227

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 20, 2011

DocketED 96255

StatusPublished

This text of 358 S.W.3d 176 (Markivee v. Markivee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Markivee v. Markivee, 358 S.W.3d 176, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1698, 2011 WL 6629227 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Debra Markivee n/k/a Debra Cook appeals from the judgment modifying child support in favor of David L. Markivee. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Debra Markivee n/k/a Debra Cook appeals from the judgment modifying child support in favor of David L. Markivee. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

358 S.W.3d 176, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1698, 2011 WL 6629227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/markivee-v-markivee-moctapp-2011.