Markin v. Markin
This text of 917 So. 2d 1011 (Markin v. Markin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
David MARKIN, Appellant,
v.
Susan MARKIN, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Joel M. Weissman of Weissman & Yaffa, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Jeffrey D. Fisher and Georgia T. Newman of Fisher & Bendeck, P.A., West Palm Beach, and Philip M. Burlington of Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We reverse an order holding appellant in contempt for failing to pay alimony which he had been ordered to pay. We do not agree with appellant's argument that a stay had been in effect; however, we do agree with appellant that he was not given an opportunity to be heard, which requires reversal. Hipschman v. Cochran, 683 So.2d 209 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
POLEN, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
917 So. 2d 1011, 2006 WL 12945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/markin-v-markin-fladistctapp-2006.