Markham v. Shue

90 N.Y.S. 1105

This text of 90 N.Y.S. 1105 (Markham v. Shue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Markham v. Shue, 90 N.Y.S. 1105 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and application for a bill of items denied, with $10 costs. Held that, the answer having been served and it not sufficiently appearing that such bill of items was necessary to enable defendant to prepare his answer, the application should have been denied. Davidow v. Auerbach, 15 App. Div. 424, 44 N. Y. Supp. 461; American Credit Indemnity Co. v. Bondy, 17 App. Div. 328, 45 N. Y. Supp. 267.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davidow v. Auerbach
15 A.D. 424 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)
American Credit Indemnity Co. v. Bondy
17 A.D. 328 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 N.Y.S. 1105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/markham-v-shue-nyappdiv-1904.