Markham v. Shue
90 N.Y.S. 1105
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 23, 1904·Published
Opinion
Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and application for a bill of items denied, with $10 costs. Held that, the answer having been served and it not sufficiently appearing that such bill of items was necessary to enable defendant to prepare his answer, the application should have been denied. Davidow v. Auerbach, 15 App. Div. 424, 44 N. Y. Supp. 461; American Credit Indemnity Co. v. Bondy, 17 App. Div. 328, 45 N. Y. Supp. 267.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Markham v. Shue, 90 N.Y.S. 1105 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).
90 N.Y.S. 1105 (Markham v. Shue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Davidow v. Auerbach
15 A.D. 424 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)
American Credit Indemnity Co. v. Bondy
17 A.D. 328 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)