Markham v. Markham

26 So. 2d 562, 248 Ala. 32, 1946 Ala. LEXIS 182
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 3, 1946·No. 3 Div. 451.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The evidence in this record has been carefully considered, in connection with the briefs and oral argument, and the Court has reached the conclusion that the decree of divorce should have been in favor of appellant on the ground of cruelty, and not in favor of appellee on the ground of adultery. The decree of the circuit court is modified in that respect, and as modified it is affirmed. A discussion of the evidence will serve no useful purpose.

Modified and affirmed.

GARDNER, C. J., and FOSTER, LAWSON, and STAKELY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Markham v. Markham, 26 So. 2d 562, 248 Ala. 32, 1946 Ala. LEXIS 182 (Ala. 1946).

26 So. 2d 562 (Markham v. Markham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jackson v. Jackson
120 So. 2d 568 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1960)
Barnett v. Barnett
109 So. 2d 717 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1959)
Meares v. Meares
56 So. 2d 661 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1952)
Hendrix v. Hendrix
34 So. 2d 214 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1948)
Blankenship v. Blankenship
28 So. 2d 409 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1946)