Markham v. Gold
866 So. 2d 777, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2711, 2004 WL 384898
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 3, 2004·No. No. 4D02-4361·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the decision granting an agricultural classification to appellees’ property. We reverse the award of attorney’s fees under section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1998). We remand to the circuit court, which may consider the propriety of attorney’s fees on appellees’ motion for sanctions relating to their motion to strike amended complaint. See Moakley v. Smallwood, 826 So.2d 221 (Fla.2002); Bitterman v. Bitterman, 714 So.2d 356 (Fla.1998).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Markham v. Gold, 866 So. 2d 777, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2711, 2004 WL 384898 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
866 So. 2d 777 (Markham v. Gold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gold v. Rodriguez
914 So. 2d 528 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)