Markham v. Gold

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Markham v. Gold

866 So. 2d 777, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2711, 2004 WL 384898

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 3, 2004

DocketNo. 4D02-4361

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 866 So. 2d 777 (Markham v. Gold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Markham v. Gold, 866 So. 2d 777, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2711, 2004 WL 384898 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the decision granting an agricultural classification to appellees’ property. We reverse the award of attorney’s fees under section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1998). We remand to the circuit court, which may consider the propriety of attorney’s fees on appellees’ motion for sanctions relating to their motion to strike amended complaint. See Moakley v. Smallwood, 826 So.2d 221 (Fla.2002); Bitterman v. Bitterman, 714 So.2d 356 (Fla.1998).

STONE, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the decision granting an agricultural classification to appellees’ property. We reverse the award of attorney’s fees under section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1998). We remand to the circuit court, which may consider the propriety of attorney’s fees on appellees’ motion for sanctions relating to their motion to strike amended complaint. See Moakley v. Smallwood, 826 So.2d 221 (Fla.2002); Bitterman v. Bitterman, 714 So.2d 356 (Fla.1998).

STONE, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

866 So. 2d 777, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2711, 2004 WL 384898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/markham-v-gold-fladistctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack