Markham King Ellis v. Culver Educational Foundation
This text of 780 F.2d 1020 (Markham King Ellis v. Culver Educational Foundation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
(The decision of the Court is referenced in a "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions" appearing in the Federal Reporter.)
MARKHAM KING ELLIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CULVER EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.
85-1800
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
11/18/85
DENIED
W.D.Mich.
ORDER
BEFORE: MERRITT, MARTIN and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges.
This matter is before the Court upon consideration of appellant's response to this Court's October 23, 1985 order to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed because of a late filed notice of appeal. Appellant has also moved for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and appointment of counsel.
It appears from the record that final judgment was entered on April 23, 1984 and that the notice of appeal filed on September 17, 1985, sixteen months late. Rules 4(a) and 26(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
The failure of an appellant to timely file a notice of appeal deprives an appellate court of jurisdiction. Compliance with Rule 4(a) is a mandatory and jurisdictional prerequisite which this Court can neither waive nor extend. Peake v. First Nat. Bank and Trust Co. of Marquette, 717 F.2d 1016 (6th Cir. 1983). Rule 26(b) specifically provides that this Court cannot enlarge the time for filing a notice of appeal.
It is ORDERED that the motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and for appointment of counsel be and are hereby denied.
It is ORDERED that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Rule 9(d)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
780 F.2d 1020, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 26055, 1985 WL 13985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/markham-king-ellis-v-culver-educational-foundation-ca6-1985.