Markey v. Brooks Memorial Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Markey v. Brooks Memorial Hospital

46 A.D.2d 1010, 361 N.Y.S.2d 785, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3397

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 12, 1974

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 46 A.D.2d 1010 (Markey v. Brooks Memorial Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Markey v. Brooks Memorial Hospital, 46 A.D.2d 1010, 361 N.Y.S.2d 785, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3397 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and motion denied without prejudice to renewing the motion in a proper county. Memorandum: Special Term, Chautauqua County, should not have entertained the motion to change venue, on the ground of convenience of witnesses, from Rockland County, in the Ninth Judicial District where plaintiff resides and where the venue of the action was properly laid, to Chautauqua County (Newell v. Huston, 35 A D 2d 908; Upstate Tel-Hotel Corp. v. Prospect House Corp., 12 A D 2d 876; CPLR 2212). In reversing the order granting the relief requested we also note the insufficiency of the papers supporting the application for change of venue (Radatron, Inc. v. Z. Z. Auto Tel., 30 A D 2d 760). (Appeal from order of Chautauqua Special Term changing venue in action for damages for wrongful death). Present — Witmer, J. P., Moule, Cardamone, Goldman and Del Vecehio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and motion denied without prejudice to renewing the motion in a proper county. Memorandum: Special Term, Chautauqua County, should not have entertained the motion to change venue, on the ground of convenience of witnesses, from Rockland County, in the Ninth Judicial District where plaintiff resides and where the venue of the action was properly laid, to Chautauqua County (Newell v. Huston, 35 A D 2d 908; Upstate Tel-Hotel Corp. v. Prospect House Corp., 12 A D 2d 876; CPLR 2212). In reversing the order granting the relief requested we also note the insufficiency of the papers supporting the application for change of venue (Radatron, Inc. v. Z. Z. Auto Tel., 30 A D 2d 760). (Appeal from order of Chautauqua Special Term changing venue in action for damages for wrongful death). Present — Witmer, J. P., Moule, Cardamone, Goldman and Del Vecehio, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 A.D.2d 1010, 361 N.Y.S.2d 785, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/markey-v-brooks-memorial-hospital-nyappdiv-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack