Markevich v. Royal Insurance
163 A.D. 920
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Markevich v. Royal Insurance. Read the opinion of the Court — 162 A.D. 640 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1914·No. Appeal No. 2·Published
Opinion
Under the decisions of Tebo v. Baker (77 N. Y. 33) and Goldenberg v. Zirinsky (114 App. Div. 827), no jurisdiction over plaintiff was acquired by the service of an order for his examination upon his attorneys. The order appealed from is, therefore, reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and without prejudice to further proceedings which defendant may take to examine plaintiff before trial. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Markevich v. Royal Insurance, 163 A.D. 920 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).
163 A.D. 920 (Markevich v. Royal Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tebo v. . Baker
77 N.Y. 33 (New York Court of Appeals, 1879)
Goldenberg v. Zirinsky
114 A.D. 827 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)