Market Tampa Investments, LLC v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Market Tampa Investments, LLC v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.

216 So. 3d 783, 2017 WL 1829482, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6317

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 5, 2017

DocketCase No. 2D15-5683

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 216 So. 3d 783 (Market Tampa Investments, LLC v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Market Tampa Investments, LLC v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co., 216 So. 3d 783, 2017 WL 1829482, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6317 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

KHOUZAM, Judge.

Market Tampa Investments, LLC, appeals the final foreclosure judgment entered in favor of Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as trustee. On Deutsche Bank’s concession of error, we reverse the attorney’s fee award in the foreclosure judgment without remand because the award is not supported by competent, substantial evidence. See Michel v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon, 191 So.3d 981, 984 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (“Because the bank did not present any evidence of attorney’s fees at trial, we reverse the fee award without remand on that issue.”). We otherwise affirm the foreclosure judgment without comment.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

CASANUEVA and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KHOUZAM, Judge.

Market Tampa Investments, LLC, appeals the final foreclosure judgment entered in favor of Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as trustee. On Deutsche Bank’s concession of error, we reverse the attorney’s fee award in the foreclosure judgment without remand because the award is not supported by competent, substantial evidence. See Michel v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon, 191 So.3d 981, 984 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (“Because the bank did not present any evidence of attorney’s fees at trial, we reverse the fee award without remand on that issue.”). We otherwise affirm the foreclosure judgment without comment.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

CASANUEVA and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

216 So. 3d 783, 2017 WL 1829482, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/market-tampa-investments-llc-v-deutsche-bank-national-trust-co-fladistctapp-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack