Market Street Railway Co. v. Central Railway Co.

51 Cal. 583
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1877
DocketNo. 4986
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 51 Cal. 583 (Market Street Railway Co. v. Central Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Market Street Railway Co. v. Central Railway Co., 51 Cal. 583 (Cal. 1877).

Opinion

By the Court:

The maintenance of horse-railroads, and running of cars upon the public streets of the city of San Francisco, designed for the carriage of passengers, is a mere special mode of using the highway, nothing more. The right to maintain such a railroad does not exclude the public from the use of the street, nor does it prevent the crossing of its track by another railroad maintained for a similar purpose, provided the crossing is effected with as little damage as may be.

We see nothing in the circumstances here which required the interposition of a court of equity to enjoin the Central B. B. Co. from maintaining their road in the manner they appear to have pursued.

The question made as to the authority of the city to grant the street railroad companies the right to use the streets of the city is not material to the disposition of this case.

If the defendant is in fact occupying or using the street without proper license to do so, it is no concern of the plaintiff any more than of any other private person, but must be inquired of by the appropriate procedure.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re O'Harra Bus Lines, Inc.
12 Alaska 129 (D. Alaska, 1948)
Holston River Electric Co. v. Hydro Electric Corp.
66 S.W.2d 217 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1933)
Lindsley v. Dallas Consol. St. Ry. Co.
200 S.W. 207 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1917)
Memphis Street Ry. Co. v. Rapid Transit Co.
138 Tenn. 594 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1917)
United Railroads v. City & County of San Francisco
239 F. 987 (N.D. California, 1917)
Memphis St. Ry. Co. v. Rapid Transit Co.
133 Tenn. 99 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1915)
Tulsa Street Ry. Co. v. Oklahoma Union Traction Co.
1910 OK 367 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1910)
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Steel
66 N.W. 830 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1896)
Santa Rosa City R. Co. v. Central St. Ry. Co.
38 P. 986 (California Supreme Court, 1895)
Street Ry. Co. v. Street Ry. Co.
6 Ohio Cir. Dec. 733 (Lucas Circuit Court, 1893)
T. & P. R'y Co. v. Rosedale Street R'y Co.
64 Tex. 80 (Texas Supreme Court, 1885)
Omnibus Railroad v. Baldwin
57 Cal. 160 (California Supreme Court, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 Cal. 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/market-street-railway-co-v-central-railway-co-cal-1877.