Marker v. Hanratty

Superior Court of Delaware

Marker v. Hanratty

97 A. 904, 29 Del. 217, 6 Boyce 217, 1916 Del. LEXIS 27

CourtSuperior Court of Delaware

DecidedMay 17, 1916

DocketNo. 91

StatusPublished

This text of 97 A. 904 (Marker v. Hanratty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marker v. Hanratty, 97 A. 904, 29 Del. 217, 6 Boyce 217, 1916 Del. LEXIS 27 (Del. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Rice, J.,

charged the jury:

[1] An assault is an unlawful attempt to do violence to the person of another, with the means at hand of carrying the attempt into execution, and a battery is the unlawful commission or execution of such violence.

[2, 3] Whenever a person is assaulted by another, he has the right to defend himself, and may use sufficient force to repel the assault in order to protect himself from bodily harm, and when necessary to protect himself from bodily harm at the hands of an assailant, the person assaulted may use necessary force in repelling the assault even before the assailant actually commits a battery upon him. But the resistance must be no more than is necessary to accomplish this. If it be greater than is required for such purpose it becomes in law excessive and without excuse or justification, making the party a wrongdoer from the beginning. Nor can a person when assaulted follow up his assailant and attack him when in the act of retiring or retreating from the scene of the affray; such a course would not be in self-defense or justifiable, on any ground.

Verdict for plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rice, J.,

charged the jury:

[1] An assault is an unlawful attempt to do violence to the person of another, with the means at hand of carrying the attempt into execution, and a battery is the unlawful commission or execution of such violence.

[2, 3] Whenever a person is assaulted by another, he has the right to defend himself, and may use sufficient force to repel the assault in order to protect himself from bodily harm, and when necessary to protect himself from bodily harm at the hands of an assailant, the person assaulted may use necessary force in repelling the assault even before the assailant actually commits a battery upon him. But the resistance must be no more than is necessary to accomplish this. If it be greater than is required for such purpose it becomes in law excessive and without excuse or justification, making the party a wrongdoer from the beginning. Nor can a person when assaulted follow up his assailant and attack him when in the act of retiring or retreating from the scene of the affray; such a course would not be in self-defense or justifiable, on any ground.

Verdict for plaintiff.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 A. 904, 29 Del. 217, 6 Boyce 217, 1916 Del. LEXIS 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marker-v-hanratty-delsuperct-1916.