Markem-Imaje Corporation v. Zipher Ltd.
This text of Markem-Imaje Corporation v. Zipher Ltd. (Markem-Imaje Corporation v. Zipher Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
MARKEM-IMAJE CORPORATION, Plaintiff,
v.
ZIPHER LTD. AND VIDEOJET TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendants-Appellants. ______________________
2013-1032 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire in No. 07-CV-0006, Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. ______________________
Decided: March 25, 2013 ______________________
KARA F. STOLL, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Gar- rett & Dunner, LLP., of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellants. With her on the brief was GARTH D. BAER. ______________________
Before NEWMAN, LINN, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges. 2 MARKEM-IMAJE CORPORATION v. ZIPHER LTD.
PER CURIAM. Subsequent to the district court’s final judgment the parties agreed to a settlement that leaves no “legitimate, continuing case or controversy.” Allflex USA, Inc. v. Avid Identification Sys., Inc., 704 F.3d 1362, 1369 (Fed. Cir. 2013). Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed. DISMISSED No costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Markem-Imaje Corporation v. Zipher Ltd., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/markem-imaje-corporation-v-zipher-ltd-cafc-2013.