Markel v. Scavo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Markel v. Scavo

292 A.D.2d 757, 744 N.Y.S.2d 908, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7865

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 27, 2002·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Motion for reargument or, in the alternative, permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals.

Upon papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is ordered that the motion for re-argument is granted, without costs, the memorandum and order dated and entered December 20, 2001 (289 AD2d 857) is vacated, and the following memorandum and order is substituted therefor, and it is further ordered that the motion for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals is denied, without costs.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for reargument or, in the alternative, permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals.

Upon papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is ordered that the motion for re-argument is granted, without costs, the memorandum and order dated and entered December 20, 2001 (289 AD2d 857) is vacated, and the following memorandum and order is substituted therefor, and it is further ordered that the motion for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals is denied, without costs.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.

Markel v. Scavo, 292 A.D.2d 757, 744 N.Y.S.2d 908, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7865 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

292 A.D.2d 757 (Markel v. Scavo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related