Markakis v. Hubig
This text of 68 Misc. 2d 196 (Markakis v. Hubig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tenant’s agreement to vacate the controlled
housing accommodations here involved was void (New York City Rent, Eviction and Rehabilitation Regulations, § 17). The protection afforded by the emergency rent laws may not be defeated by invoking equitable estoppel or an alleged third-party beneficiary contract (Moncel Realty Corp. v. Whitestone Farms, 188 Misc. 431, affd. 272 App. Div. 899; Morris v. Flint & Bradley, 99 N. Y. S. 2d 126, affd. 277 App. Div. 1025).
The final judgment should be unanimously reversed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Concur — Croat, P. J., Schwartzwald and Margbtt, JJ.
Final judgment reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
68 Misc. 2d 196, 327 N.Y.S.2d 401, 1970 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1031, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/markakis-v-hubig-nyappterm-1970.