Markakis v. Hubig

68 Misc. 2d 196, 327 N.Y.S.2d 401, 1970 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1031
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided December 21, 1970·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Tenant’s agreement to vacate the controlled

housing accommodations here involved was void (New York City Rent, Eviction and Rehabilitation Regulations, § 17). The protection afforded by the emergency rent laws may not be defeated by invoking equitable estoppel or an alleged third-party beneficiary contract (Moncel Realty Corp. v. Whitestone Farms, 188 Misc. 431, affd. 272 App. Div. 899; Morris v. Flint & Bradley, 99 N. Y. S. 2d 126, affd. 277 App. Div. 1025).

The final judgment should be unanimously reversed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Concur — Croat, P. J., Schwartzwald and Margbtt, JJ.

Final judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Markakis v. Hubig, 68 Misc. 2d 196, 327 N.Y.S.2d 401, 1970 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1031 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

68 Misc. 2d 196 (Markakis v. Hubig) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grasso v. Matarazzo
180 Misc. 2d 686 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Merwest Realty Corp. v. Prager
173 Misc. 2d 868 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1997)