Mark Walters v. OpenAI, L.L.C.
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit
No. 23-13843
Non-Argument Calendar
MARK WALTERS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus OPENAI, L.L.C.,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:23-cv-03122-MLB
2 Opinion of the Court 23-13843
Before WILSON, JORDAN, and LUCK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Mark Walters sued OpenAI, L.L.C., in state court for defamation . After OpenAI removed the case to federal court, the district court issued an order requiring OpenAI to show why the case should not be remanded to state court due to lack of diversity. OpenAI responded, but eventually withdrew its notice of removal.
Mr. Walters then filed a motion for costs and fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). See D.E. 34. In its remand order, the district court denied the motion for fees and costs without explanation. See D.E. 39 (“The Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Costs and Attorney ’s Fees.”).
We review the denial of fees and costs under § 1447(c) for abuse of discretion. See Booknight v. Monroe Cty., 446 F.3d 1327, 1329 (11th Cir. 2006). In his brief, Mr. Walters argues that we must remand the case to the district court for it to provide some explanation for its denial of fees and costs. See Appellant’s Br. at 10-11.
We agree. As a general matter, the standard for awarding fees and costs under § 1447(c) “turn[s] on the reasonableness of the removal.” Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp., 546 U.S. 132, 141 (2005). But “[w]ithout any explanation for its denial of a request for fees [and costs], it is impossible for us to discern the correctness of the district court’s judgment. It is necessary, therefore, to remand the case to the district court for an explanation[.].” In re Trinity Industries , Inc., 876 F.2d 1485, 1496 (11th Cir. 1989).
23-13843 Opinion of the Court 3
VACATED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mark Walters v. OpenAI, L.L.C. (Mark Walters v. OpenAI, L.L.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.