Mark v. Wisconsin
308 U.S. 520, 60 S. Ct. 264
This text of 308 U.S. 520 (Mark v. Wisconsin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mark v. Wisconsin, 308 U.S. 520, 60 S. Ct. 264 (1939).
Opinion
The motion for leave to file the motion to dismiss the appeal' is granted. The motion to dismiss is also granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Hurtado v. California, 110 U. S. 516; Bolln v. Nebraska, 176 U. S. 83; Lem Woon v. Oregon, 229 U. S. 586. The motion for- leave to proceed further in forma pauperis is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hurtado v. California
110 U.S. 516 (Supreme Court, 1884)
Bolln v. Nebraska
176 U.S. 83 (Supreme Court, 1900)
Lem Woon v. Oregon
229 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
308 U.S. 520, 60 S. Ct. 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mark-v-wisconsin-scotus-1939.