Mark v. Wisconsin
308 U.S. 520, 60 S. Ct. 264
Opinion
The motion for leave to file the motion to dismiss the appeal' is granted. The motion to dismiss is also granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Hurtado v. California, 110 U. S. 516; Bolln v. Nebraska, 176 U. S. 83; Lem Woon v. Oregon, 229 U. S. 586. The motion for- leave to proceed further in forma pauperis is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mark v. Wisconsin, 308 U.S. 520, 60 S. Ct. 264 (1939).
308 U.S. 520 (Mark v. Wisconsin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hurtado v. California
110 U.S. 516 (Supreme Court, 1884)
Bolln v. Nebraska
176 U.S. 83 (Supreme Court, 1900)
Lem Woon v. Oregon
229 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 1913)