Mark v. Fox

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Mark v. Fox

102 N.Y.S. 464

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedFebruary 4, 1907

StatusPublished

This text of 102 N.Y.S. 464 (Mark v. Fox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mark v. Fox, 102 N.Y.S. 464 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from order for open commission. Action to recover for goods sold and delivered. The answer alleges plaintiffs’ failure to comply with the contract of sale, whereby defendants suffered damage, $218.35,' which is counterclaimed. Upon this simple issue an open commission was ordered, without opinion of the court below. The moving affidavits fail to state good reasons or necessity for putting either of the parties to the unusual and expensive practice of an open commission.

The order should be reversed, with' costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from order for open commission. Action to recover for goods sold and delivered. The answer alleges plaintiffs’ failure to comply with the contract of sale, whereby defendants suffered damage, $218.35,' which is counterclaimed. Upon this simple issue an open commission was ordered, without opinion of the court below. The moving affidavits fail to state good reasons or necessity for putting either of the parties to the unusual and expensive practice of an open commission.

The order should be reversed, with' costs and disbursements.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 N.Y.S. 464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mark-v-fox-nyappterm-1907.