Mark Twain Manor Homes, Inc. v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission, Division of Employment Security

631 S.W.2d 72, 1982 Mo. App. LEXIS 2735
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 9, 1982
DocketNo. 44702
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 631 S.W.2d 72 (Mark Twain Manor Homes, Inc. v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission, Division of Employment Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mark Twain Manor Homes, Inc. v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission, Division of Employment Security, 631 S.W.2d 72, 1982 Mo. App. LEXIS 2735 (Mo. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

CLEMENS, Senior Judge.

Donna J. Keeran, a discharged nurse’s aid of Mark Twain Manor, applied for unemployment benefit. Upon hearing, the Commission’s Appeal Tribunal denied compensation on the ground employee had been discharged for mistreating an elderly resident. On review however the Commission found testimony of mistreatment was not convincing, reversed, and held the employee was entitled to benefits. On appeal the circuit court affirmed and the employer has appealed. We affirm.

The elderly resident did not testify. The home’s witnesses testified from their notes that the resident had complained, saying that about 4:00 A.M. the employee had roughly taken her by the arm in leading her to the bathroom. The employee acknowledged leading the resident but denied doing so roughly. As said, the Commission found the employer’s hearsay evidence was not convincing and accepted the employee’s explanation.

The Commission is the ultimate trier of the facts and it alone may decide the evidentiary weight and credibility. Resolution of conflicting evidentiary inferences rests with the Commission and its resolution is conclusive on the reviewing court. Lyell v. Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, 553 S.W.2d 899 at 901[1] (Mo.App.1977).

Judgment affirmed.

REINHARD, P. J., and SNYDER and CRIST, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barlynn Enterprises, Inc. v. Foell
209 S.W.3d 558 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)
McGrath v. Satellite Sprinkler Systems, Inc.
877 S.W.2d 704 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1994)
Garden View Care Center, Inc. v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission
848 S.W.2d 603 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1993)
Morotz v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission
669 S.W.2d 60 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1984)
Powell v. DIV. OF EMP. SEC., ETC.
669 S.W.2d 47 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
631 S.W.2d 72, 1982 Mo. App. LEXIS 2735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mark-twain-manor-homes-inc-v-labor-industrial-relations-commission-moctapp-1982.