Mark Steven Van Buskirk v. George H. Baldwin

255 F.3d 974, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5466, 2001 Daily Journal DAR 6725, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 14341
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mark Steven Van Buskirk v. George H. Baldwin. Read the opinion of the Court — 265 F.3d 1080
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 28, 2001·No. 00-35640·Published

Opinion

255 F.3d 974 (9th Cir. 2001)

MARK STEVEN VAN BUSKIRK, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
GEORGE H. BALDWIN, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE.

No. 00-35640

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Argued and Submitted May 9, 2001--Portland, Oregon
Filed June 28, 2001

NOTE: THIS OPINION HAS BEEN AMENDED. SEE AMENDED OPINION AT 265 F.3d 1080.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mark Steven Van Buskirk v. George H. Baldwin, 255 F.3d 974, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5466, 2001 Daily Journal DAR 6725, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 14341 (9th Cir. 2001).

255 F.3d 974 (Mark Steven Van Buskirk v. George H. Baldwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Van Buskirk v. Baldwin
255 F.3d 974 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)