Mark S. Tidman and Evelyn J. Tidman v. The Salvation Army, Bertha Worthy, Kenneth E. Brewer, Fred Ruth - Concuring

CourtCourt of Appeals of Tennessee
DecidedJuly 15, 1998
Docket01-A-01-9708-CV-00380
StatusPublished

This text of Mark S. Tidman and Evelyn J. Tidman v. The Salvation Army, Bertha Worthy, Kenneth E. Brewer, Fred Ruth - Concuring (Mark S. Tidman and Evelyn J. Tidman v. The Salvation Army, Bertha Worthy, Kenneth E. Brewer, Fred Ruth - Concuring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mark S. Tidman and Evelyn J. Tidman v. The Salvation Army, Bertha Worthy, Kenneth E. Brewer, Fred Ruth - Concuring, (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

IN T H E C O U R T O F A P P E A L S O F T E N N E S S E E A T N A S H V IL L E

M A R K S . T ID M A N a n d ) E V E L Y N J . T ID M A N , ) ) P l a i n t i f f s /A p p e l l a n t s , ) ) A p p e a l N o . ) 0 1 -A -0 1 -9 7 0 8 -C V -0 0 3 8 0 V S . ) ) D a v id s o n C i r c u it

F L E I D ) N o . 9 7 C -1 7 6 T H E S A L V A T IO N A R M Y , )

J A M E S R . W O R T H Y , B E R T H A ) W O R T H Y , K E N N E T H E . B R E W E R , ) J u ly 1 5 , 1 9 9 8 F R E D R U T H , ) ) C e c il W . C r o w s o n D e f e n d a n t s /A p p e l l e e s . ) A p p e lla t e C o u r t C le r k

A P P E A L E D F R O M T H E C IR C U IT C O U R T O F D A V ID S O N C O U N T Y A T N A S H V I L L E , T E N N E S S E E

T H E H O N O R A B L E W A L T E R C . K U R T Z , J U D G E

L A R R Y L . C R A IN 1 0 1 W e s tp a rk D r iv e , S u it e 2 5 0 B re n tw o o d , T e n n e s s e e 3 7 0 2 7 A tt o rn e y f o r P l a i n t i f f s /A p p e l l a n t s

L . G IN O M A R C H E T T I, J R . W IL L IA M G . M C C A S K IL L , J R . T A Y L O R , P H IL B IN , P IG U E , M A R C H E T T I & B E N N E T T , P L L C O n e U n io n S t r e e t P . O . B o x 1 9 8 1 6 9 N a s h v ille , T e n n e s s e e 3 7 2 1 9 -8 1 6 9 A t t o r n e y s f o r D e f e n d a n t s /A p p e l l e e s A F F IR M E D A N D R E M A N D E D

B E N H . C A N T R E L L , J U D G E C O N C U R : T O D D , P .J ., M .S . C A IN , J .

O P I N I O N

T w o fo r m e r S a lv a tio n A r m y o ffic e r s , a h u s b a n d a n d w ife

w h o h a d b e e n d e m o t e d a n d d is c h a rg e d , s u e d th e ir s u p e rio r o ffic e r s

a n d T h e S a lv a tio n A rm y it s e lf f o r in v a s io n o f p r iv a c y , in t e n t io n a l

in flic t io n o f e m o t io n a l d is tr e s s , n e g lig e n t in flic t io n o f e m o t io n a l

d is tre s s , a n d o u tra g e o u s c o n d u c t. T h e C ir c u it C o u r t o f D a v id s o n

C o u n ty d is m is s e d th e c o m p la in t fo r fa ilu r e to s ta te a c la im u p o n

w h ic h r e lie f c a n b e g r a n t e d . W e a ffir m , a n d h o ld , in a d d it io n , t h a t t h e

d e fe n d a n ts ’ a c t io n s w e r e p r o t e c t e d b y th e F ir s t A m e n d m e n t t o t h e

U n it e d S t a t e s C o n s tit u t io n .

I.

T h e p la in t iffs , M a rk a n d E v e ly n T id m a n , w e re

c o m m is s io n e d a s lie u t e n a n t s in T h e S a lv a tio n A r m y ’s S o u th e rn

T e r r it o r y . A f t e r s e r v in g a t c o m m u n it y c e n te rs in B ir m in g h a m a n d

- 2 - S e lm a , A la b a m a , t h e T id m a n s w e r e t r a n s fe r r e d t o N a s h v ille u n d e r t h e

c o m m a n d o f M a j o r J a m e s W o r t h y a n d h is w if e , M a j o r B e r t h a W o r t h y .

T h e fo llo w in g fa c ts a re a lle g e d in th e c o m p la in t . W e

r e c it e t h e m a s if t h e y w e r e t r u e , a s w e a r e c o m p e lle d t o d o in r u lin g

o n t h e m o t io n t o d is m is s . C o r n p r o p s t v . S lo a n , 5 2 8 S .W .2 d 1 8 8 (T e n n .

1 9 7 5 ) . W e h a s t e n t o a d d , h o w e v e r , t h a t t h e y a r e o n ly a lle g a t io n s .

P r io r t o c o m in g t o N a s h v ille , M r . T id m a n h a d s o u g h t a n d

r e c e iv e d p e r m is s io n to a tte n d o u t s id e c o u n s e li n g fo r a p e rs o n a l

p r o b l e m , u n d e r T h e S a l v a t i o n A r m y ’s m e d i c a l c o v e r a g e . S h o r t l y a f t e r

a r r iv in g in N a s h v ille , M r s . T id m a n w a s a p p r o a c h e d b y B e r t h a W o r t h y

r e g a r d in g a ru m o r a b o u t M r. T id m a n . M rs . W o rth y a s s u re d M rs .

T id m a n th a t s h e w a s a c tin g a s M r s . T id m a n ’s p a s to r a n d th a t th e

d e t a ils d is c u s s e d “ w o u ld n o t le a v e th e r o o m .” R e ly in g o n th e s e

a s s u r a n c e s , M r s . T id m a n c o n fid e d t o M r s . W o r t h y th a t h e r h u s b a n d

h a d c o n fe s s e d o n c e to h a v in g a n e x tr a m a r it a l a ff a ir . M rs . W o rth y

t h e n r e c o m m e n d e d th a t t h e T id m a n s m e e t w it h h e r a n d h e r h u s b a n d

t h e n e x t d a y . D u r in g t h is m e e t in g , M a jo r J a m e s W o r t h y a s s u r e d t h e

T id m a n s th a t t h e y w e re s p e a k in g c o n fid e n t ia lly a n d th a t h e w a s

a c t in g in a p a s to r a l c a p a c it y . H o w e v e r, M r. W o rth y b e ra t e d a n d

in t e r r o g a t e d M a r k T id m a n in a n a c c u s a to r y m a n n e r ; h e d e m a n d e d a

c o n fe s s io n a b o u t t h e a ffa ir fr o m M a r k T id m a n ; a n d h e s ta t e d t h e o n ly

w a y f o r M r . T i d m a n t o s a v e f a c e w a s t o r e s ig n . M r . T i d m a n r e f u s e d

- 3 - t o c o n fe s s , a n s w e r in g o n ly t h a t h e h a d t o ld h is w ife e v e ry th in g s h e

n e e d e d to k n o w a n d th a t th e y w e re c o m m it t e d to m a r r ia g e

c o u n s e lin g .

A t a b o u t th e s a m e t im e , E d w a r d L a it y , T h e S a lv a tio n

A r m y ’s T e r r it o r ia l C o u n s e lo r in A t la n t a , c o n t a c t e d M r . T i d m a n ’s

o u t s id e c o u n s e lo r , s e e k in g t o d is c o v e r t h e d e t a il s o f t h e c o u n s e li n g

s e s s io n s .

In N o v e m b e r o f 1 9 9 5 , K e n n e th B re w e r, T h e S a lv a tio n

A r m y ’s D iv is io n a l C o m m a n d e r , t o ld M r s . T i d m a n ’s fa t h e r o f t h e r u m o r

t h a t M a r k T i d m a n w a s e n g a g e d in a n o n g o in g a f f a i r . M r s . T i d m a n ’s

fa th e r c o n fro n te d M rs . T id m a n a b o u t th e a lle g a t io n . M r . B r e w e r ’s

m o t iv a tio n w a s a lle g e d ly to c a u s e a rift in th e T id m a n fa m ily , t o

i n f l i c t s e v e r e e m o t i o n a l i n j u r y o n M a r k T i d m a n , a n d t o c a u s e h im to

r e s ig n .

In J a n u a ry o f 1 9 9 6 , F r e d R u t h , t h e D ir e c t o r o f P e r s o n n e l

fo r T h e S a lv a tio n A rm y , s u m m o n e d th e p la in t iffs to a m e e t in g in

N a s h v ille , b y fa ls e ly re p r e s e n tin g to th e m th a t th e p u rp o s e o f th e

m e e t in g w a s a p e r s o n n e l in t e r v ie w . In s te a d , th e T id m a n s w e re

c o n fr o n t e d b y M r . R u t h , M a jo r B r e w e r , a n d M a jo r J a m e s W o r t h y , w h o ,

a g a in , t r ie d t o c o e r c e M r . T i d m a n in t o c o n f e s s in g h is in f id e lit y . I n t h e

- 4 - m e e t in g , M r . R u t h r e v e a le d t h a t h e h a d le a r n e d o f M r . T i d m a n ’s p a s t

h is t o r y o f p a s t o r a l c o u n s e li n g f r o m M r . L a it y .

M r. a n d M rs . T id m a n w e re la t e r d is m is s e d fro m t h e ir

p o s it io n s in T h e S a l v a t io n A r m y a n d w e r e t o ld t o v a c a t e t h e ir liv in g

q u a r t e r s in t w o d a y s . M r . R u t h d is c lo s e d t o M r s . T i d m a n ’s fa t h e r t h e

d e t a ils o f t h e J a n u a ry m e e t in g .

II.

T h e T id m a n s s u e d J a m e s a n d B e r th a W o rt h y , K e n n e th

B re w e r, a n d F re d R u th fo r in v a s io n o f p r iv a c y , in t e n t io n a l a n d

n e g lig e n t in flic t io n o f e m o t io n a l d is tr e s s a n d o u tra g e o u s c o n d u c t.

T h e y n a m e d T h e S a l v a t io n A r m y it s e lf o n t h e t h e o r y o f r e s p o n d e a t

s u p e rio r .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mark S. Tidman and Evelyn J. Tidman v. The Salvation Army, Bertha Worthy, Kenneth E. Brewer, Fred Ruth - Concuring, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mark-s-tidman-and-evelyn-j-tidman-v-the-salvation--tennctapp-1998.