Mark S. Nelson v. Ron Angelone

54 F.3d 786, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 22370, 1995 WL 309954
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 22, 1995
Docket94-16434
StatusPublished

This text of 54 F.3d 786 (Mark S. Nelson v. Ron Angelone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mark S. Nelson v. Ron Angelone, 54 F.3d 786, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 22370, 1995 WL 309954 (9th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

54 F.3d 786
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Mark S. NELSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Ron ANGELONE, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-16434.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 1995.*
Decided May 22, 1995.

Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

California state prisoner Mark S. Nelson appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion for a preliminary injunction in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action, seeking to require prison officials to provide him with photocopying, legal mailing, hygiene items, and medically necessary chair and his memory typewriter, to stop retaliating against him for filing grievances, and to properly train the prison's correctional officers. Subsequent to Nelson's filing of his action with the district court, he was released on parole. Accordingly, Nelson's motion for preliminary injunctive relief, challenging the conditions of his confinement, was rendered moot by his release on parole. See Johnson v. Moore, 948 F.2d 517, 519 (9th Cir. 1991).

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 F.3d 786, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 22370, 1995 WL 309954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mark-s-nelson-v-ron-angelone-ca9-1995.