Mark S. Daniels v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, a Delaware Corporation
This text of 962 F.2d 960 (Mark S. Daniels v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, a Delaware Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The parties have notified the court that a settlement has been reached in the above-entitled action. Based upon the settlement, the parties stipulated that the claims in the above-entitled action be dismissed with prejudice, with each party bearing its own costs. Accordingly, the opinion in Daniels v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, 916 F.2d 568 (9th Cir.1990), is vacated and dismissed with prejudice. The parties are directed to bear their own costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
962 F.2d 960, 92 Daily Journal DAR 5927, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3730, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 15704, 1992 WL 86205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mark-s-daniels-v-burlington-northern-railroad-company-a-delaware-ca9-1992.