Mark S. Daniels v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, a Delaware Corporation

Ninth Circuit

Mark S. Daniels v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, a Delaware Corporation

962 F.2d 960, 92 Daily Journal DAR 5927, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3730, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 15704, 1992 WL 86205

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mark S. Daniels v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, a Delaware Corporation. Read the opinion of the Court — 916 F.2d 568 →

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 1, 1992·No. 89-35654·Published

Opinion

The parties have notified the court that a settlement has been reached in the above-entitled action. Based upon the settlement, the parties stipulated that the claims in the above-entitled action be dismissed with prejudice, with each party bearing its own costs. Accordingly, the opinion in Daniels v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, 916 F.2d 568 (9th Cir.1990), is vacated and dismissed with prejudice. The parties are directed to bear their own costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The parties have notified the court that a settlement has been reached in the above-entitled action. Based upon the settlement, the parties stipulated that the claims in the above-entitled action be dismissed with prejudice, with each party bearing its own costs. Accordingly, the opinion in Daniels v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, 916 F.2d 568 (9th Cir.1990), is vacated and dismissed with prejudice. The parties are directed to bear their own costs.

Mark S. Daniels v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, a Delaware Corporation, 962 F.2d 960, 92 Daily Journal DAR 5927, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3730, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 15704, 1992 WL 86205 (9th Cir. 1992).

Pincite

962 F.2d 960 (Mark S. Daniels v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, a Delaware Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related