Mark Rocanova v. United States of America and Commissioner of Internal Revenue
This text of 109 F.3d 127 (Mark Rocanova v. United States of America and Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
109 F.3d 127
79 A.F.T.R.2d 97-1654, 97-1 USTC P 50,300
Mark ROCANOVA, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America and Commissioner of Internal
Revenue, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 1210, Docket 96-5079.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Argued March 18, 1997.
Decided March 24, 1997.
Appeal from a grant of summary judgment for defendants in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Denny Chin, Judge) in an action seeking a declaration that it is unconstitutional to extend a statute of limitations for collection actions that were not already time-barred. We affirm.
Richard M. Kraver, Kraver & Levy, LLP, New York City, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Linda A. Riffkin, Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, New York City (Mary Jo White, United States Attorney, Gideon A. Schor, Assistant United States Attorney, of counsel), for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: FEINBERG, CARDAMONE, and WINTER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
We affirm for substantially the reasons stated in the district court's opinion. See Rocanova v. United States, 955 F.Supp. 27 (S.D.N.Y.1996).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
109 F.3d 127, 79 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1654, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 6442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mark-rocanova-v-united-states-of-america-and-commissioner-of-internal-ca2-1997.