Mark Robertson v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 8, 2026·No. 1D2025-3273·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

No. 1D2025-3273

MARK ROBERTSON, Petitioner, v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

Petition for Writ of Prohibition—Original Proceedings.

July 8, 2026

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED as unauthorized. See Logan v. State, 846 So. 2d 472, 479 (Fla. 2003) (holding that generally, a criminal defendant cannot proceed pro se while represented by counsel).

ROBERTS, KELSEY, and TREADWELL, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Mark Robertson, pro se, Petitioner. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mark Robertson v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).

Mark Robertson v. State of Florida (Mark Robertson v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Logan v. State
846 So. 2d 472 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)