Mark Richard Harris v. Merrick Brian Garland

District Court, C.D. California·Decided February 23, 2023·No. 2:22-cv-08592·Unknown

Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-08592-FMO-MAR Document 18 Filed 02/23/23 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:61

JS-6 MARK RICHARD HARRIS, et al, ) Case No. CV 22-8592 FMO (MARx) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE MERRICK BRIAN GARLAND, et al, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been resolved, (Dkt. 16, Response to Order to Show Cause), IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown by no later than April 24, 2023, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure to re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline set forth above shall be deemed as consent by the parties to dismissal of the action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962). Dated this 23rd day of February, 2023. /s/ Fernando M. Olguin United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mark Richard Harris v. Merrick Brian Garland, (C.D. Cal. 2023).

Mark Richard Harris v. Merrick Brian Garland (Mark Richard Harris v. Merrick Brian Garland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Link v. Wabash Railroad
370 U.S. 626 (Supreme Court, 1962)
Davis v. McGrew
23 P. 41 (California Supreme Court, 1889)