Mark Lucio v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: January 5, 2015
• Docket: 07-14-00023-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

, Oi y 0510{§ '~ ' Hg§)e@&. mm @w/§L\~oooaz>»<;v§ `I`_k\`§ "`\`§X‘?_, Am§\\o Cc\url' 05 Qo@@a)§. M- iLz/Wmflo Tiu\%

FILED_ Su13;N:F-r-li.Q_-=¢===:§-13 ~ l _ Y\/(&»§/K 'L_um`b \A\\\ n 8 9011§§

mucoum or APFBALS vwlAN LoNG cLERK

\./.

Tie` 5'+§&€ C)P T£,x§;§ llpp@`\\e€_

i/LPP€¢LL mi mst MUMBQK dc LNQ‘?~/iz~oc, FROM r§§z‘ sr§)m~§~ §§ d§a~§§a§cr Juoicm¢L Cou(h§ 0§¢? Sus§s§&Q_i Qc>uxs'<\? 1

51*7~%"\* fm §§'O§Q> §-`§>P§ ix~§~w€§o§\\ 0€ '§`§§vs§. re §?§u'¢ mamman P§zz> §§ ‘B@_§¢LG 03 1 P§£§§>o§\§$€ -§o AHDQ§L‘S ’R§a§q§

75 T»<§& LK<)M®§U%L£.. ;SKLST§Q€,S 041 "§'\'<\£ Qou

C,G\W°éb mw W(cwl l~uuc' APpUlc§rv¥' p_§:;>_€__ Qcmcl WSPQCHT§.U\§ MG_U__€"> ‘Ur\e 7 (c §m\/ ~Ln Q\L‘§Q§\é§ ><\\e E§Q&é\`\n€ §F§§§r £§'\ ma \/§I‘s \:§§c§x-' (

C>VL jovumm S\°§;(`i‘. \'l'\€ mm H)§md` CX\DPQ,\\Q§Y\“K_@U~\\ j__ O€{I)$§§ _, O_`j~@j@\ "

L) §§L\)SJ§§:\§\(Q ]f€$§ ~H§r,.n l @§r@§v§/\ "\/§Q \\§§/u 0§532 5s€rl r)w§§"§\_/§Me)c~l' 0:_+0§` u§_vwrg

\Mtf){\€nvwo\e§d' m U/\Q TQY~C~§ DQMYli§/LQ§/dr ]Q{'\ (`§rm/Lw§cz.l "FD§_§+§Q€

L

…£MFYL°LW[“@M€M(_LEM ll %MMLH@§§LD M §§]gd_gn #w/Ié¢/§ b§»/S»F @,q [/'H'§ idaho/ho Md /)MC€ HM viii

5(_/2@_53 br/H:` 19/ y€§,Do/§é€ !0 /'h_¢ }¢/m/§€f§ 6»/#~.[

_ ’ 5 raw g M¢A mcs&. §§ -»‘c valabl

MM§QL££SP£G£ALAM_##

‘.+€ we

\r\<‘; g v \G

é{)*e-- ;L" g l ' A¥'\’\c\%\_ ` 1\ O`\L'{`¥ ' l ;~ - . ,, ,.,. \w@k'~> .m

§§ \ a DN»@ §§ §§R§w, ~.…~M:+ §§ ,m§\\\w.& k\§_§.\\§ ~X m3 \Q v

§§ _,

\»m@§ §§

a

.

~

we~§

@§L~ Q\ R\\\§\\w

Um§§w\`. @~w*\\wx Q\ NN§W §_\w§ §.§

§§§.Q. _\\Q\ mh §\Qw 1 ww»¢\%

T__JJ.L ...~?::..T.~.£L:¢T::I_;;LZ:;