Mark Louis Trapolino v. Denise Kay Trapolino

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 13, 2007
Docket14-06-00706-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Mark Louis Trapolino v. Denise Kay Trapolino (Mark Louis Trapolino v. Denise Kay Trapolino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mark Louis Trapolino v. Denise Kay Trapolino, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 13, 2007

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 13, 2007.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-06-00706-CV

MARK LOUIS TRAPOLINO, Appellant

V.

DENISE KAY TRAPOLINO, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law

Austin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2005L-3874

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N


This is an appeal from a judgment signed April 26, 2006.  On May 17, 2007, the court ordered the parties to mediate this case.  On June 25, 2007, the mediator notified this court that the parties had reached a settlement agreement at mediation.  According to the terms of this court=s mediation order, the parties were required to filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, or other dispositive motion, within ten days of the completion of mediation.  No motion was filed.  On July 12, 2007, the court ordered the parties to file a motion to dismiss or other dispositive motion within ten days.  Appellee requested and was granted an extension of time to file the motion until August 10, 2007.  On August 6, 2007, appellee advised this court that she had complied with the settlement agreement, but appellant had not provided a motion to dismiss the appeal. 

Therefore, on August 21, 2007, this court notified appellant that the appeal would be dismissed for failure to comply with this court=s July 12, 2007, order, unless any party filed a response to this court=s notice by September 4, 2007, showing meritorious grounds to continue the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).  No response was received.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed September 13, 2007.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Hudson and Guzman.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mark Louis Trapolino v. Denise Kay Trapolino, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mark-louis-trapolino-v-denise-kay-trapolino-texapp-2007.