Mark Lomax v. Kelly Shantz, Winston Roy Johnson, Amitava Dasgupta, and Yolanda Ibarra

Court of Appeals of Texas

Mark Lomax v. Kelly Shantz, Winston Roy Johnson, Amitava Dasgupta, and Yolanda Ibarra

DecidedJanuary 8, 2009

Docket14-08-00486-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Mark Lomax v. Kelly Shantz, Winston Roy Johnson, Amitava Dasgupta, and Yolanda Ibarra (Mark Lomax v. Kelly Shantz, Winston Roy Johnson, Amitava Dasgupta, and Yolanda Ibarra) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mark Lomax v. Kelly Shantz, Winston Roy Johnson, Amitava Dasgupta, and Yolanda Ibarra, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 8, 2009

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 8, 2009.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-08-00486-CV

MARK LOMAX, Appellant

V.

KELLY SHANTZ, WINSTON ROY JOHNSON, AMITAVA DASGUPTA,

and YOLANDA IBARRA, Appellees

On Appeal from the 129th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2007-67295

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed February 12, 2008. The clerk=s record was filed on August 15, 2008. No reporter=s record was taken. Appellant=s brief was originally due September 15, 2008. No brief was filed.

In an order issued October 2, 2008, appellant was informed his brief was due November 3, 2008. No brief was received. No motion for extension of time was filed. On December 5, 2008, appellees filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8 (a)(1), and 42.3(b). Appellant filed no response.

The motion is granted and the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Brown, and Boyce.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI