Mark Lee Overman v. F. T. Wilkinson, Warden, United States Penitentiary
This text of 256 F.2d 58 (Mark Lee Overman v. F. T. Wilkinson, Warden, United States Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order dismissing a petition for habeas corpus on the ground that petitioner’s remedy was by motion under Sec. 2255, 28 U.S.C.A. in the court which had sentenced him.
The record discloses that this is appellant’s second petition for habeas corpus. His first petition was denied with the suggestion that the petitioner’s remedy was by a Section 2255 motion in the sentencing court, and petitioner filed such a motion. This motion denied, he-did not appeal and seems now to be reapplying for habeas corpus relief on the ground that he is entitled to do so since he did not get the relief he asked from the sentencing court. The law is otherwise declared. 1
The judgment dismissing his petition-was right, and it is affirmed.
. Hildebrandt v. Swope, 9 Cir., 229 F.2d 582.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
256 F.2d 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mark-lee-overman-v-f-t-wilkinson-warden-united-states-penitentiary-ca5-1958.