Mark L. Pomeranz v. Victor K. Rones, etc.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed June 26, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D22-1752 Lower Tribunal No. 22-9901 ________________
Mark L. Pomeranz, Appellant,
vs.
Victor K. Rones, etc., Appellee.
An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, David C. Miller, Judge.
Landsman Law Firm, P.A., and Lisa C. Landsman (Hallandale), for appellant.
Victor K. Rones P.A., and Victor K. Rones and Jeremy S. Rones, for appellee.
Before LINDSEY, MILLER and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Allstate Mortg. Sols. Transfer, Inc. v. Bank of Am., N.A., 338 So. 3d 985, 988 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (explaining that because first step
defendant took in case “did not assert any challenge to service of process or
otherwise contest the court’s jurisdiction over [him], [he] waived any
subsequent challenge to personal jurisdiction, and could not validly contest
the sufficiency of service of process in a subsequently filed motion to quash
service of process”); Chestnut v. Nationstar Mortg. LLC, 255 So. 3d 397, 399
(Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (“By failing to raise service of process in his pre-answer
motion to dismiss, Chestnut submitted himself to the trial court’s jurisdiction
and thus waived his right to later assert that defense.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mark L. Pomeranz v. Victor K. Rones, etc. (Mark L. Pomeranz v. Victor K. Rones, etc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.