Mark Koch v. Michael Kozeal

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided October 4, 2017·No. 16-4197·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

No. 16-4197

Mark Allen Koch

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Michael Kozeal; Jan Oeltjen; Tim Liebert; Mickey Schneider; Ron Jepsen; Mike Criss; Gwenda Horky; J. D. Keefe; City of Sargent, Nebraska

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha

Submitted: September 20, 2017 Filed: October 4, 2017

[Unpublished]

Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Mark Koch appeals from the order of the District Court1 granting defendants’

motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

After de novo review, we conclude that the District Court properly dismissed the complaint. See Skit Int’l, Ltd. v. DAC Techs. of Ark., Inc., 487 F.3d 1154, 1156 (8th Cir.) (standard of review), cert. denied, 552 U.S. 991 (2007). Koch’s filings clearly indicate that he brought the instant suit seeking to overturn a previously entered state-court judgment, and the District Court correctly concluded that it had no jurisdiction. See Dodson v. Univ. of Ark. for Med. Scis., 601 F.3d 750, 754 (8th Cir. 2010) (per curiam) (noting that federal courts generally have no subject matter jurisdiction to consider appeals from state-court judgments), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 1135 (2011). We affirm the judgment and deny Koch’s motions to supplement the record.

1 The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mark Koch v. Michael Kozeal, (8th Cir. 2017).

Mark Koch v. Michael Kozeal (Mark Koch v. Michael Kozeal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Advanced Cellular Systems v. Puerto Rico Telephone Co.
128 S. Ct. 499 (First Circuit, 2007)