Mark Kelly v. Pete Hegseth
This text of Mark Kelly v. Pete Hegseth (Mark Kelly v. Pete Hegseth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 26-5070 September Term, 2025 1:26-cv-00081-RJL Filed On: March 2, 2026 Mark Kelly, United States Senator Representing the State of Arizona,
Appellee
v.
Pete Hegseth, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of Defense, et al.,
Appellants
BEFORE: Henderson, Pillard, and Pan, Circuit Judges
ORDER
Upon consideration of the motion to expedite briefing and argument in this appeal, it is
ORDERED that the appeal be expedited. The following briefing schedule will apply:
Appellants’ Brief March 20, 2026
Joint Appendix March 20, 2026
Appellee’s Brief April 15, 2026
Reply Brief April 27, 2026
It is FURTHER ORDERED that oral argument be scheduled before this panel at 9:30 a.m. on Thursday, May 7, 2026.
The parties are directed to hand deliver the paper copies of their briefs to the Clerk's office by 4:00 p.m. on the date due. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 26-5070 September Term, 2025
Appellants should raise all issues and arguments in the opening brief. The court ordinarily will not consider issues and arguments raised for the first time in the reply brief.
To enhance the clarity of their briefs, the parties are urged to limit the use of abbreviations, including acronyms. While acronyms may be used for entities and statutes with widely recognized initials, briefs should not contain acronyms that are not widely known. See D.C. Circuit Handbook of Practice and Internal Procedures 43-44 (2025); Notice Regarding Use of Acronyms (D.C. Cir. Jan. 26, 2010).
All briefs and appendices must contain the date that the case is scheduled for oral argument at the top of the cover. See D.C. Cir. Rule 28(a)(8).
Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT: Clifton B. Cislak, Clerk
BY: /s/ Scott H. Atchue Deputy Clerk
Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mark Kelly v. Pete Hegseth, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mark-kelly-v-pete-hegseth-cadc-2026.